Revisiting Surpanakha: Reclaiming Narrative Space, Agency, and the Female Body
Iramma V. H.
Research Scholar, Bangalore University.
Received: March 06, 2026
Accepted: March 30, 2026
Published Online: May 02, 2026
Abstract
In the dominant versions of the Ramayana, Surpanakha is represented as an ugly, monstrous, pot-bellied demoness and positioned as the antithesis of the obedient and passive Sita. Her transgressive behaviour renders her a villain and invites severe punishment. This stereotyping is reinforced through popular media, which visualizes her with grotesque features, an ugly face, a monstrous body with long nails, sharp teeth, and horns. She is depicted as a temptress. This one-dimensional representation denies her agency, complexity, and humanity. In contrast, contemporary writers such as Kavita Kane, Volga, Sara Joseph, Anand Neelakantan, and others have reimagined her character with feminist, Aryan-Dravidian, and subaltern framework. These writers reinterpret her not as an adulteress but as an assertive and confident woman who resists the subjugation of women and Aryan supremacist ideology. These alternative perspectives on Surpanakha subvert the mainstream narratives and reimagine her as a figure of resistance who challenges patriarchal, gendered, and racial subjugation. This study examines a revisionist theatrical representation of Surpanakha in Surpanakha: A Search (2025), a solo performance by theatre artist Parshathy J Nath. Parshathy undertakes an inquiry into one of the marginalised characters of the Ramayana and reimagines Surpanakha’s mutilation as the result of a chauvinistic attitude towards female sexuality. By foregrounding questions of agency, bodily autonomy, space, and choice, Surpanakha: A Searchconnects the epic past with contemporary realities. The performance highlights how the constraints imposed on Surpanakha continue to shape the lived experiences of women today, thereby reclaiming her as a symbol of resistance against patriarchal, racial, and cultural domination.
Keywords: Body, Space, Gap, Feminist perspective, Aryan-dravidian, Racial conflicts.